An investigation of the factor structure and convergent and discriminant validity of the five-factor model rating form.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Five-Factor Model Rating Form (FFMRF) is a one-page measure designed to provide an efficient assessment of the higher order domains of the Five Factor Model (FFM) as well as the more specific, lower order facets proposed by McCrae and Costa. Although previous research has suggested that the FFMRF's assessment of the lower order facets converge reasonably with other FFM measures, the structural validity of the domain-level assessment has not yet been evaluated. The current study employed an exploratory structural equation modeling framework to investigate the fit of a five-factor solution within a combined sample of 757 participants. This was a novel analysis using a combined sample drawn from three previously published studies and was composed primarily of undergraduates but also included a smaller clinical subsample. Results indicated that the FFMRF is well accommodated within a five-factor solution. Furthermore, the FFMRF domain scores evinced large correlations with domain scores from the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised. The results suggest that the FFMRF might hold promise as a choice for those seeking a brief measure that provides a valid assessment of both the broad and specific traits of the FFM.
منابع مشابه
Investigation of the Construct Validity of Assessment and Development Center for Managers: Case Study of National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC)
The purpose of this study was to examine the construct validity of the Assessment and Development Center for Managers of NIOC. The method of research was applied and the data collection was descriptive – analytical. The statistical sample included which have been selected by simple random sampling (Cochranchr('39')s sample size formula) 1022 managers from the competent managers’ database of the...
متن کاملWho is an Ideal Organizational Leader in Iran? Examining the Content, Structure, and Consequences of Iranian Implicit Leadership Theories (IILTS)
Implicit Leadership Theories (ILTs) are individuals’ perceptions of the traits and behaviors characterizing leaders. Four studies investigated the reliabilities and different types of validities for a scale developed to measure Iranian Implicit leadership Theories (IILTs). Study 1 used a qualitative method to extract the implicit theories of ideal leadership after interviewing 27 experts. The I...
متن کاملساخت و اعتباریابی مقیاس دانش و نگرش جنسی
Abstract The main purpose of this study was to present an account of the development and examine psychometric properties of Sexual Knowledg and Attitude Scale (SKAS) including construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. Eight hundred and thirty seven Iranian men and women (385 men, 451 women) participated in this study, voluntari...
متن کاملExploring the Factor Structure, Reliability and Validity of the Food Craving Questionnaire-Trait in Iranian adults
Background & Aims: Food Craving refers to an intense desire for eating specific foods. Food Craving Questionnaire-Trait (FCQ-T) is the most commonly used instrument to assess food craving as a multidimensional construct. Its 39 items have an underlying nine-factor structure for both the original English and Spanish versions; but subsequent studies yielded fewer factors. The pre...
متن کاملPsychometric properties of an abbreviated instrument of the five-factor model.
Brief measures of the five-factor model (FFM) have been developed but none include an assessment of facets within each domain. The purpose of this study was to examine the validity of a simple, one-page, facet-level description of the FFM. Five data collections were completed to assess the reliability and the convergent and discriminant validity of the rating form with other measures of the FFM...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Assessment
دوره 20 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013